There are now five generations in the workplace, but are they truly sharing ideas? A new report reveals a costly disconnect in which more than a third (35%) of employees consider their meetings unproductive, potentially costing UK organisations £64 billion. When GENERATIONS meet: The Productivity Potential of Multigenerational Meetings is the latest report from a preliminary study by The Inclusion Initiative (TII) at The London School of Economics (LSE), sponsored by sister company Protiviti. The study highlights the strategic importance of harmonious collaboration across the five generations and the immense benefits it can yield. Download now On Tuesday, 29th October, Protiviti hosted a keynote speech by Grace Lordan, associate professor at the LSE and director of the Inclusion Initiative, to launch the new report. This was followed by an enlightening panel discussion with Dr Daniel Jolles (Research Officer in Behavioural Science at The Inclusion Initiative (TII) at the LSE), Shoshanna Davis (founder of Fairy Job Mother and Gen-Z engagement expert), Antoinette Raymond PhD (Behavioural and Business Scientist, Organisational Psychologist), and Alex Trusty (Global Diversity Sourcing Specialist at Moody's Corporation). Panel host Matt Duncan (Managing Director, Protiviti UK) explored some of the report’s key themes with the expert panel to reveal why organisations benefit from proportional generational inclusivity in meetings, the main barriers, and how they can be dismantled in the short and long term.
When GENERATIONS Meet revealed that 82% of executives who report proportionate generational representation in workplace meetings say their organisation outperforms the competition. It also positively impacts retention; 60% of employees who reported their employer having a culture of inclusive meetings said they were unlikely to look for a new job within a year, versus just 36% for non-inclusive meeting environments. “If we were going to set a meeting and we were thinking about who we were going to invite, we'd want to make sure that we had people who brought different skills, knowledge, maybe domain expertise, into the meeting. And we know that those different perspectives are going to be valuable. They're going to help with the ideas. They're going to help us make good decisions. And as a behavioural scientist, we have a term for this. It's called ‘intellectual capital.’ And executive meetings are particularly important because that's where key decisions are made. And it's not just what happens in the room, it's the way those decisions flow through the organization.” says Daniel. "What we see is that when we have more generational diversity in executive meetings, it means that we have higher intellectual capital in the organisation. And we think that explains the relationship between getting more generational diversity into executive meetings and the productivity outcomes. The key point is that we're raising the intellectual capital by leveraging the experience, knowledge networks, and other things that each generation brings to the room." Read more: Unlocking the power of generational diversity 
The report identified several barriers to productive, inclusive meetings, including hierarchical culture, generational differences regarding perceptions of productivity, resistance to change, and lack of inclusive leadership. For example, younger women report the lowest meeting productivity, with 40% of meetings experienced as unproductive by Gen Z women, compared to just 27% for men.  "I think men tend to be more confident than women, especially if you're early on in your career. If you're just starting out, you're probably less likely to be as confident," says Shoshanna. "But then equally, a lot of the time when young people are invited to a meeting, they don't necessarily have the context. They don't know what the meeting's about. They don't know what their role in the meeting is. So, I think that's potentially a reason in terms of productivity. If you're coming to a meeting where you don't know what on earth is going on, you're then going to judge that meeting as less productive.  "I also think there are quite a lot of corporate practices which, to me, just seem a little bit outdated. A little bit unnecessarily corporate for the sake of things. I've been in plenty of meetings where other people have come away and they've found the meeting very productive. But to me, I've just been falling asleep, and I've just found it a bit silly. So, I think in general, different generations have different definitions of productivity," she says.
Barriers to inclusive meetings, including hierarchical cultures where senior voices dominate, can be tackled through strategies that help build confidence in younger employees and encourage vulnerability from leaders. Such strategies should ideally include a blend of 'meta' (big picture) changes and 'micro' (actionable) hacks, which improve meeting dynamics and inclusivity in the short and long term. "As an organisational psychologist, meetings can tell me about the overall health of an organisation," says Antoinette. "Meta issues for impacting meeting health are the things we know we should do — enhancing and developing leadership styles, inclusion policies and procedures, culture, being explicit about what gets rewarded, etc. But there is no way you can wait for all those to align to get good meeting behaviours or get inclusion.  "But there are smaller action hacks that can help get you to some of that big change. For example, mentor moments using AI and reverse mentoring. One of my favourites is implicit bias taboo chats. It's been found in research that if you directly and explicitly talk about implicit bias and make it common language to talk about—if you start talking about those things—it becomes an okay question to ask." Read more: 5 ways to manage generational differences in the workplace 
Inclusive and productive meetings are underpinned by mutual support, psychological safety for giving feedback, and vulnerability shown at the leadership level. Alex recommends planning meetings more intentionally by providing agendas and ensuring everyone has an opportunity to speak.  "Give everyone in the group an opportunity to speak and provide options for you, and that then gives them a good feeling that they've contributed within the team or the organisation. It means they'll want to contribute even more, and you'll also feel safer in that sense — if any biases happen within team meetings, it mitigates against some of those. So, it can be a really powerful thing," he says. "I also think it's important for senior leaders to show a little bit of vulnerability, and I know that leaders don't like to do that, but when you show vulnerability, people realise, ‘Hey, you are human like me, and so you may have doubts, but guess what? You've done so fantastically well to get to where you are. I'm going to have that belief in myself, and I'm going to speak up and contribute as much as I can.’" Alex also recommends employee network groups as a gateway to starting meaningful conversations about generational diversity within the organisation, at all levels, and not just with senior leadership. "I just think that sometimes we need to put our money where our mouths are and really push forward and try to open up opportunities and see how things go. We can always tweak diversity and inclusion it's an evolution. Conversation, education, and pushing that need as much as possible can make a big difference," Alex says.

Download When GENERATIONS Meet: The Productivity Potential of Multigenerational Meetings for insights and actionable strategies to foster an inclusive, productive multigenerational workforce.